« Dig Spots Woth Peepin': A1 Records, NYC | Main | Pete Rock's Drums Makes Kanye's "Runaway" Soar »

December 14, 2010

Bangladesh Says No Royalties Paid For "A Milli"

In The World Of Beat Placements, You Don't Always Get Paid

By AMIR SAID (SA'ID)

In this video, Bangladesh speaks frankly about not being paid royalties for "A Milli." "A Milli," from Lil Wayne's 2008 hit album, The Carter III, won a Grammy award for Best Rap Solo Performance at the 51st Grammy Awards; and the The Carter III has sold nearly 3 million copies to date. Yet according to beatmaker/producer Bangladesh, he hasn't received any royalty payments for his credited production work.

Appearing clearly frustrated by the situation, Bangladesh directly cites Cash Money Records' Co-Founder/CEO Birdman as the cause for not receiving royalty payments. Bangladesh doesn't hide his disappointment with the matter, giving a brief overview of how and when royalty payments should normally be paid.

Bangladesh's story is a cautionary tell about the world of beat placements. Although many beatmakers covet placements with named recording artists, most are unaware of the not-so little-known secret that payments for beats often come slow, if at all. And even though Cash Money Records may not represent how all labels handle royalty payments for beatmakers (producers), Cash Money's alleged non-payment to Bangladesh (and similar situation with Manny Fresh) should, however, be considered as something common in the obscure world of beat placements.

For educational purposes...

On Birdman & Lil Wayne Not Paying Him Royalties For A Milli! (via www.SuckerFreeTV.com)


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e554d2e4f488340148c6c12b96970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bangladesh Says No Royalties Paid For "A Milli":

Dedicated to exploring the art of beatmaking in all of its glory.

Your email address:
  

  • Donate Sidebar

  • BeatTips Top 30 Beatmakers

  • Build Your Skills

  • Top 5 Myths About Sampling and Copyright Law


    "Sampling is piracy."
    WRONG! Piracy describes the wholesale, verbatim copying and distribution of copyrighted works. That is not sampling; that's something entirely different.
    Read more

    "You can legally sample and use any recording up to 1, 2, 3, or 4 seconds."
    WRONG! Under existing copyright law, there is no clear, predetermined length (amount in seconds) that is “legally” permissible to sample.
    Read more

    "If you use samples on a free mixtape, it’s perfectly O.K."
    WRONG! A free mixtape does NOT permit you to use samples from copyrighted recordings without the permission of the copyright holders.
    Read more

    "Sampling is easy; there’s nothing to it. Anyone can do it well."
    WRONG! Sampling is an art form that requires technical skill, imagination, and artistic understanding.
    Read more

    "Sampling involves the use of pre-recorded songs only."
    WRONG! While the art of sampling is most commonly understood to include the use of pre-recorded songs (traditionally from vinyl records), source material for sampling includes any recorded sound or sound that can be recorded.
    Read more



  • BeatTips
    Essential Listening

  • RIGHTS DISCLAIMER:
    BeatTips.com is a website dedicated to music education, research, and scholarship. All the music (or music videos) provided on this site is (are) for the purposes of teaching, scholarship, research, and criticism only! NOTE: Under U.S. Code, Section 107 “Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use” of the Copyright Act of1976: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching… scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." (U.S. Code)

Categories