« May 2014 | Main | September 2014 »

1 posts from June 2014

June 01, 2014

BeatTips Readers Poll: Is Having a Signature Sound Important?

A Signature Sound, a Uniquely Identifiable Style and Sound, Goes a Long Way in Distinguishing Yourself


At some point, all beatmakers settle into a style and sound. No matter the methods, processes, or EMPIs (Electronic Music Production Instruments) that you use, you typically prioritize one style or sound. But from here, what comes next? That is, after you find the style and sound that fits you, do you simply work within it as is, with no attempts at furthering distinguishing your version of the style and sound, or do you aim for creating your own signature sound? Indeed, Do you think that having a signature sound is important?

I believe that crafting a unique style and sound should be the goal of every beatmaker. Otherwise, what's the alternative? Knock-offs of other prominent beatmakers who have already developed their own signature sound? Thing is, being able to distinguish your beats from other beatmakers is critical to your ability to build your own music platform. Therefore, I believe that developing your own signature sound goes a long way in this regard.

Still, there are some people who believe that having a signature sound isn't important at all (despite the fact that most, if not all, acclaimed recording artists of the twentieth century had one). For those who take this position, I'm not quite sure if their interpretation of "signature sound" is accurate. A signature sound is a uniquely identifiable Style and Sound, it's a composite music style all one's own. It can be made up of any number of things, subtle or obvious; and it contain a many distinguishable components like, a specific kind of drum style and sound, a certain type of arrangement, even a special kind of mix. Having a signature sound doesn't mean having an inflexible approach to music. On the contrary, it means having a style and sound that's situated within your own unique interpretation of the base style and sound that you're working from. Whether your style is sample-based, non-sample-based, or hybrid, whether it's boom bap, Southern bounce, or an eclectic mix of different styles, you can still carve out your own signature sound.

The BeatTips Manual by Sa'id.
"The most trusted name in beatmaking."

Dedicated to exploring the art of beatmaking in all of its glory.

Your email address:

  • Donate Sidebar

  • BeatTips Top 30 Beatmakers

  • Build Your Skills

  • Top 5 Myths About Sampling and Copyright Law

    "Sampling is piracy."
    WRONG! Piracy describes the wholesale, verbatim copying and distribution of copyrighted works. That is not sampling; that's something entirely different.
    Read more

    "You can legally sample and use any recording up to 1, 2, 3, or 4 seconds."
    WRONG! Under existing copyright law, there is no clear, predetermined length (amount in seconds) that is “legally” permissible to sample.
    Read more

    "If you use samples on a free mixtape, it’s perfectly O.K."
    WRONG! A free mixtape does NOT permit you to use samples from copyrighted recordings without the permission of the copyright holders.
    Read more

    "Sampling is easy; there’s nothing to it. Anyone can do it well."
    WRONG! Sampling is an art form that requires technical skill, imagination, and artistic understanding.
    Read more

    "Sampling involves the use of pre-recorded songs only."
    WRONG! While the art of sampling is most commonly understood to include the use of pre-recorded songs (traditionally from vinyl records), source material for sampling includes any recorded sound or sound that can be recorded.
    Read more

  • BeatTips
    Essential Listening

    BeatTips.com is a website dedicated to music education, research, and scholarship. All the music (or music videos) provided on this site is (are) for the purposes of teaching, scholarship, research, and criticism only! NOTE: Under U.S. Code, Section 107 “Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use” of the Copyright Act of1976: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching… scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." (U.S. Code)